Receive your 
Free Newsletter

Name
eMail

 

 

As a Western Australian community service, Tan and Tan Lawyers offers free e-mail legal advice. If you have a question relating to virtually any matter of law, refer to the:

Ask a Legal Question

section or visit Mr. Raymond Tan's blog

THIS ADVICE IS FOR AUSTRALIAN LAW ONLY AS OUR PRACTICE IS BASED IN AUSTRALIA.

 

Focus On Law  

 

‘Prior Cancellation of Visa When Course of Study Has Not Been Completed’

(by A.J. Aristei, independent Barrister)

 

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Ahmed and Another [2005] FCAFC 58

Breach of Condition – Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 8                     

Condition 8202(c)

Can a student visa be cancelled under condition 8202(c) when the course the student is participating in hasn’t finished?

Key points:

            - cancellation

            - Whether Minister may act when breach likely or probable?

            - Whether later events may be taken into account?

 

Can the Minister act when a breach is likely or probable?

Any university student can tell you that a grade is not given out before you finish a semester-long unit! There are many circumstances where one can find themselves doing very well in an assignment, but then fail the end of semester exam, hence failing a unit. The point that I am trying to make is that it is hard to determine whether a student is going to satisfactorily complete a course until their course is finished.

 

This now leads me to the question of whether a student’s visa can be cancelled when a student has not completed their course. For instance, what if it looks like the student cannot satisfy the attendance requirement or academic satisfaction required under Condition 8202(c) of the E.S.O.S. Act?

 

The case that deals with this point of law (which seems more like a puzzle) is M.I.M.I.A. v Ahmed. In this case, the delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs cancelled Ahmed’s student visa prior to the scheduled completion of the course in which he was enrolled.

 

The argument from the academic institution was that the cancellation was on the grounds that the Respondent could not satisfy the attendance requirement in the Migration Regulations 1994 Cth, Sch 8, item 8202(b) and would therefore be unable to obtain a certificate from the education-provider as required by Sch 8, item 8202(c).

Just to refresh your memory on the above items, Condition 8202(b) stipulates that a student on a visa must attend their course AT LEAST 80% of the time.

 

Condition 8202(c) stipulates that if there is no evidence that a student has attended their course at least 80% of the time, then they cannot complete their course at a satisfactory level.

 

When this matter was taken to the Migration Review Tribunal, The tribunal found that by the time of cancellation, it was clear that the Respondent would be unable to satisfy Sch 8, item 8202(c). The Tribunal proceeded on the basis that the position was to be judged at the date of cancellation of the visa, but took into account facts occurring thereafter in assessing the position.

 

The decision made by the Courts was that the phrase “for the course” meant that the course had to be completed. Therefore, condition 8202(b) could only be breached where it is impossible for the condition to be achieved by the end of the course.

In addition, the Court held that there cannot be an anticipatory breach of condition 8202(c). Rather there has to be evidence that attendance was not evident before looking at the satisfactory completion of the course studied. There can be no such failure prior to the completion of the course.

 

Conclusion

To answer the question posed at the start: the answer is no. Unless there has been completion of the course studied, there cannot be any anticipation that the requirements of condition 8202 of the Migration Regulations will be breached.

 

[Please note that this case-summary does not take account of any actual or pending appeals against the case analysed. Nor is any assessment (actual or pending) made of possible changes to legislation that may counter the effect of this case]

 

^To Top

 

Advice on Real Estate

Advice on Settlements

In partnership with:

Real Estate Portfolio

In partnership with:

  HOME | CONTACTS
 

Access to and use of the Tan and Tan Lawyers Perth website and

free email advice service is provided subject to terms and conditions.
Your use of this Perth law service constitutes your acceptance of these terms and conditions.
Please read the terms and conditions and our privacy policy carefully.

 
 

Tan & Tan Lawyers, Perth © 2007

 

Tan and Tan Lawyers became an incorporated practice on 1st July 2007.

ACN: 125 895 187

 

 
 
  Web Page Design by: BITZ-Q Consulting